Written by Marijn Overvest | Reviewed by Sjoerd Goedhart | Fact Checked by Ruud Emonds | Our editorial policy
Kotter’s Model of Change — Definition, 8 Steps Change Model + Examples

As taught in the Sustainable Procurement Course / ★★★★★ 4.9 rating
What is Kotter’s model of change?
- Kotter’s model of change is an 8-step change management framework that helps organizations plan, implement, and sustain successful change.
- Kotter’s model explains how leaders can create urgency, build a guiding coalition, communicate vision, and anchor change in the organization.
- Kotter’s change model is a structured approach for managing organizational change, reducing resistance, and achieving long-term transformation.
What Is Kotter’s Model of Change?
Kotter’s Model of Change, also known as Kotter’s Theory, is a structured change management framework developed by John P. Kotter to help organizations implement successful transformation. The model is based on 8 steps for leading change, including creating urgency, building a guiding coalition, forming a strategic vision, removing barriers, and anchoring change in the organization. Its main purpose is to reduce resistance, guide employees through change, and make organizational transformation more sustainable.
Kotter’s Model of Change explains that successful change does not happen only through planning, but also through strong leadership, clear communication, and employee involvement. The model helps organizations create momentum by generating short-term wins and sustaining progress until the change becomes part of the organizational culture. Because of this, Kotter’s Model of Change is widely used in business, leadership, and organizational development when companies need to manage strategic or operational change.
The Kotter’s 8 Steps Model of Change
Kotter’s 8-Step Model of Change is a structured framework that helps organizations manage change in a clear, organized way. It explains how leaders can create urgency, involve employees, remove barriers, and make change sustainable in the long term.
1. Create a Sense of Urgency
The first step is to create a strong sense of urgency about the need for change. Employees and managers need to understand that the current way of working may no longer be suitable, competitive, or responsible. This step focuses on presenting clear reasons for change, such as market pressure, customer expectations, regulatory requirements, or internal inefficiencies. When people understand the importance of immediate action, they are more likely to support the change process.
In relation to sustainability, urgency can be created by showing environmental risks, increasing energy costs, waste problems, or pressure from customers and regulations. Organizations can use sustainability reports, carbon footprint data, supplier risks, or ESG requirements to explain why sustainable change is necessary.
Example:
A company notices that its packaging creates too much plastic waste, increases disposal costs, and does not meet the expectations of environmentally conscious customers. At the same time, new environmental regulations are putting additional pressure on the company to reduce plastic use and improve packaging sustainability. Management collects data on waste volumes, customer complaints, packaging costs, and regulatory risks to show employees why immediate change is necessary.
To create a stronger sense of urgency, the company presents these findings in internal meetings and explains how unsustainable packaging can affect brand reputation, compliance, and long-term competitiveness. Employees are then encouraged to support the transition toward recyclable, reusable, or biodegradable packaging alternatives. In this way, the example shows how urgency can motivate people to understand the need for sustainable change.
2. Build a Guiding Coalition
The second step is to build a guiding coalition that will lead and support the change process. This coalition should include people with influence, knowledge, credibility, and decision-making power. It can include top managers, department leaders, sustainability experts, procurement managers, and employees who are respected within the organization. The purpose of this group is to coordinate change, remove obstacles, and motivate others to participate.
From a sustainability perspective, the guiding coalition should include people who understand environmental, social, and economic aspects of business. This helps ensure that sustainability is not treated as a separate activity, but as part of strategy, operations, procurement, and organizational culture.
Example:
A retail company forms a sustainability change team that includes managers from procurement, logistics, marketing, finance, and operations. Each department brings a different perspective to the change process, such as supplier selection, transportation efficiency, customer communication, investment planning, and operational implementation. This makes the coalition stronger because sustainability is treated as a shared responsibility rather than the task of only one department.
The team meets regularly to define priorities, solve problems, and coordinate actions across the organization. For example, procurement focuses on finding more sustainable suppliers, logistics works on reducing transport emissions, and marketing communicates sustainability improvements to customers. This guiding coalition helps ensure that the change process is organized, credible, and supported by people with influence and expertise.
3. Form a Strategic Vision and Initiatives
The third step is to create a clear strategic vision that explains what the organization wants to achieve through change. The vision should be simple, realistic, and easy for employees to understand. It should show the future direction of the organization and explain how the change will improve performance, competitiveness, and long-term value. Along with the vision, the organization should define concrete initiatives that turn the vision into practical actions.
In sustainability, the vision should clearly connect business goals with environmental and social responsibility. This may include reducing emissions, improving supplier sustainability, using renewable energy, minimizing waste, or developing circular business models.
Example:
A manufacturing company creates a vision to become a low-waste and energy-efficient organization within five years. This vision gives employees a clear picture of the desired future and explains why sustainability is important for reducing costs, improving efficiency, and strengthening the company’s market position. Instead of presenting sustainability as a general idea, the company connects it with measurable goals and practical business improvements.
To support this vision, the company introduces several initiatives, such as energy monitoring, supplier sustainability assessment, recycling programs, and investment in cleaner production technology. Each initiative is linked to a specific objective, such as reducing electricity consumption, minimizing production waste, or improving the environmental performance of suppliers. This makes the vision easier to understand and gives employees concrete actions they can follow.
4. Enlist a Volunteer Army
The fourth step is to involve a large number of employees who are willing to support and promote the change. Change cannot depend only on top management, because successful transformation requires broad participation across the organization. Employees should feel that they have a role in the process and that their ideas and actions matter. This step helps create commitment, motivation, and shared ownership of the change.
In sustainability initiatives, employee involvement is especially important because sustainable behavior often depends on everyday decisions and habits. Employees can contribute by reducing waste, saving energy, suggesting process improvements, and supporting responsible business practices.
Example:
A company launches an internal sustainability campaign and invites employees to become “green ambassadors.” These employees are not only asked to follow sustainability practices themselves, but also to motivate their colleagues and promote responsible behavior within their departments. By involving employees voluntarily, the company creates stronger engagement and makes the change feel more participative.
The green ambassadors support activities such as recycling, energy-saving behavior, paperless work, and more responsible use of resources. They also collect suggestions from employees and share practical ideas with management, such as reducing unnecessary printing or improving waste separation in offices. This helps sustainability become part of everyday work and encourages employees to see themselves as active contributors to change.
5. Enable Action by Removing Barriers
The fifth step is to identify and remove barriers that prevent employees from acting in line with the change. Barriers can include outdated procedures, lack of resources, poor communication, resistance from managers, unclear responsibilities, or limited training. If these obstacles remain, employees may understand the change but still be unable to implement it. Removing barriers gives people the opportunity, confidence, and tools to support transformation.
In sustainability, barriers often include higher initial costs, a lack of supplier data, limited knowledge, or existing processes that do not support sustainable choices. Organizations need to adjust policies, provide training, allocate resources, and redesign processes so that sustainable actions become easier to implement.
Example:
A procurement department wants to select more sustainable suppliers, but the existing supplier evaluation form focuses only on price and delivery. Because sustainability criteria are not included, employees do not have a clear way to compare suppliers based on environmental or social responsibility. This creates a barrier because even motivated employees cannot make sustainable decisions if the process does not support them.
The company removes this barrier by redesigning the supplier evaluation form and adding criteria such as certifications, carbon emissions, labor standards, waste management practices, and compliance with sustainability requirements. Procurement employees also receive training on how to assess these criteria and how to communicate expectations to suppliers. As a result, sustainable supplier selection becomes easier, more structured, and better aligned with the company’s change goals.
6. Generate Short-Term Wins
The sixth step is to create visible short-term wins that show progress early in the change process. These wins help employees see that the change is possible and that their efforts are producing results. Short-term wins also build confidence, reduce resistance, and motivate people to continue supporting the transformation. They should be measurable, realistic, and clearly connected to the overall change vision.
In sustainability, short-term wins can show that responsible practices bring both environmental and business benefits. For example, reducing energy consumption, cutting waste, improving recycling rates, or switching to a more sustainable supplier can quickly demonstrate a positive impact.
Example:
A company introduces LED lighting in its warehouse to reduce energy consumption and operating costs. Within the first few months, the company measures a visible reduction in electricity use and identifies financial savings from lower energy bills. This result provides an early success that employees can easily understand and connect with the sustainability change process.
Management shares the results with employees through internal communication channels and explains how a relatively simple initiative created measurable environmental and business benefits. This short-term win helps reduce resistance because employees can see that sustainability initiatives are realistic and useful. It also builds confidence for larger projects, such as improving heating systems, optimizing warehouse equipment, or investing in renewable energy.
7. Sustain Acceleration
The seventh step is to maintain momentum after the first successes are achieved. Organizations should not stop after short-term wins, because real change requires continuous effort and improvement. This step focuses on expanding successful initiatives, solving new problems, and preventing employees from returning to old habits. Leaders need to keep communicating progress and encouraging further action.
In sustainability, sustaining acceleration means moving from isolated green initiatives to wider organizational transformation. After initial results, companies can expand sustainability practices across more departments, suppliers, products, and business processes.
Example:
After reducing energy consumption in one warehouse, a logistics company decides to apply the same approach to all its distribution centers. The company uses the first successful project as a learning experience and identifies which actions can be repeated, improved, or adapted in other locations. This prevents the organization from stopping after one success and helps maintain momentum in the change process.
In the next phase, the company introduces additional sustainability initiatives, such as route optimization, electric delivery vehicles, better load planning, and supplier sustainability requirements. Leaders continue to communicate progress and encourage departments to identify new opportunities for improvement. In this way, sustainability moves from one isolated project to a broader transformation across the logistics network.
8. Institute Change
The final step is to change part of the organization’s culture, systems, and everyday routines. Change becomes sustainable only when new behaviors are accepted as the normal way of working. This means connecting change with training, performance measurement, leadership behavior, employee evaluation, and organizational values. When change is institutionalized, it is less dependent on individual leaders and more embedded in the organization.
In relation to sustainability, this step means that sustainable thinking becomes part of decision-making, procurement, operations, reporting, and long-term strategy. Sustainability should no longer be treated as a temporary project, but as a permanent part of how the organization creates value.
Example:
A company permanently includes sustainability indicators in employee performance evaluations, supplier selection, investment decisions, and annual reporting. This means that sustainability is no longer treated as a temporary project, but as a regular part of how the company measures success and makes decisions. Employees and managers understand that responsible resource use, sustainable procurement, and environmental performance are now expected in everyday work.
Over time, these practices become part of the company’s culture and operating system. New employees are trained in sustainability expectations, suppliers are evaluated according to sustainability standards, and managers are expected to support long-term environmental and social goals. This shows that the change has been institutionalized because sustainable behavior becomes the normal way of working across the organization.
5 Benefits of Kotter’s Model of Change
5 Challenges of Kotter’s Model of Change
3 Real-Life Examples of Kotter’s Model of Change in Sustainability
1. Unilever – Sustainable Living Plan
Unilever launched the Sustainable Living Plan to connect business growth with a lower environmental and social impact. In line with Kotter’s Model of Change, the company first created a sense of urgency around sustainability, as climate challenges, consumer expectations, and supply chain pressures required a new way of doing business. It then developed a clear vision that connected sustainability with brands, procurement, production, and consumer behavior. In this way, change was not presented only as an environmental responsibility, but as part of a long-term business strategy.
This transformation shows how Kotter’s steps can be connected with sustainability through vision communication, employee involvement, and gradual visible results. Unilever worked on more sustainable sourcing, waste reduction, responsible production, and stronger social responsibility across its global value chain. Short-term achievements helped maintain momentum, while the long-term goal was to embed sustainability into the company’s culture and everyday decision-making. This approach shows that sustainable change requires leadership, clear goals, and active participation from different parts of the organization.
2. IKEA – People & Planet Positive Strategy
IKEA used the People & Planet Positive strategy to move toward a more sustainable business model, with a focus on climate action, circularity, and fair business practices. This change can be connected with Kotter’s model because it starts with a clear recognition of the need for change, especially due to climate change, resource consumption, and customer expectations. The company defined a strategic vision to become more circular and climate-responsible by 2030. This vision gives employees, suppliers, and partners a clear direction for action.
The link with sustainability can be seen through initiatives related to renewable energy, resource efficiency, recycled materials, and product design that support longer product life. IKEA expanded the change across different parts of the business, from procurement and product design to logistics and customer relations. In Kotter’s terms, this shows the importance of removing barriers, involving the wider organization, and institutionalizing new practices. When sustainability is included in planning, targets, and everyday decisions, change becomes part of organizational culture, not only a separate project.
3. Interface – Mission Zero and Climate Take Back
Interface began its sustainability transformation through the ambitious Mission Zero program, with the aim of significantly reducing the company’s negative environmental impact. This process can be clearly connected with Kotter’s model because the company first created a strong need for change and developed an inspiring vision for sustainable business. Instead of treating sustainability as an additional activity, Interface connected it with products, processes, innovation, and business strategy. After achieving progress through Mission Zero, the company continued its transformation through Climate Take Back, with the ambition to contribute to solving climate challenges.
In the context of sustainability, Interface shows how short-term wins can support long-term transformation. The company worked on reducing emissions, developing more sustainable materials, introducing circular solutions, and changing the way the flooring industry thinks about sustainability. According to Kotter’s model, this case highlights the importance of vision, coalition, barrier removal, and continuous acceleration after the first results. When sustainability is embedded into innovation, products, and company culture, it becomes a permanent part of business identity.
Why Is It Important To Learn Kotter’s Model of Change For Sustainable Procurement?
Learning Kotter’s Model of Change for sustainability procurement is important because it helps organizations manage the transition from traditional purchasing to more responsible, sustainable, and ESG-oriented procurement practices. The model provides a clear structure for creating urgency, aligning leadership, engaging employees, and embedding sustainable procurement into everyday decision-making. It also helps reduce resistance to change, improve supplier collaboration, and make sustainability initiatives more long-term and measurable.
Conclusion
Kotter’s Model of Change, also known as Kotter’s Theory, provides a clear and practical framework for managing organizational transformation, especially when companies need to introduce sustainability into procurement practices. By following its eight steps, organizations can create urgency, build leadership support, engage employees, remove barriers, and make sustainable change part of everyday operations. This makes the model useful not only for planning change but also for reducing resistance and increasing long-term commitment.
In sustainable procurement, Kotter’s model helps organizations move from traditional purchasing focused mainly on price toward responsible procurement based on ESG goals, supplier collaboration, and long-term value. It supports the integration of sustainability into supplier selection, performance measurement, employee behavior, and organizational culture. As a result, companies can make procurement more resilient, responsible, and aligned with broader sustainability objectives.
Frequentlyasked questions
What is Kotter's model of change?
Kotter’s model of change, also known as Kotter’s Theory, is an 8-step change management framework that helps organizations plan, implement, and sustain successful transformation.
How does Kotter's model of change work?
Kotter’s model of change works by guiding organizations through steps such as creating urgency, building a guiding coalition, forming a vision, removing barriers, generating short-term wins, and anchoring change in culture.
Why is it important to learn Kotter's model of change in sustainable procurement?
Learning Kotter’s model of change in sustainable procurement is important because it helps organizations reduce resistance, engage stakeholders, improve supplier collaboration, and embed sustainability into procurement decisions.
About the author
My name is Marijn Overvest, I’m the founder of Procurement Tactics. I have a deep passion for procurement, and I’ve upskilled over 200 procurement teams from all over the world. When I’m not working, I love running and cycling.




