Written by Marijn Overvest | Reviewed by Sjoerd Goedhart | Fact Checked by Ruud Emonds | Our editorial policy
Sustainable Procurement Report 2026

As taught in the Sustainable Procurement Course / ★★★★★ 4.9 rating
What is the latest sustainable procurement report 2026?
- The latest 2026 sustainable procurement report is an overview of key trends, forecasts, and regulatory signals shaping procurement sustainability.
- It’s defined as one reference list of the newest measurable U.S. signals, forecasts, policy deadlines, and reporting expectations.
- In practice, it’s a current snapshot of 2026 changes that procurement teams can track to guide sustainable sourcing.
What is a Sustainable Procurement Report?
A sustainable procurement report is a document that summarizes how an organization integrates sustainability into its purchasing decisions and processes. It highlights key actions such as sustainable sourcing, supplier engagement, and the use of environmental and social criteria. Its purpose is to show progress and measurable impact over time.
The report increases transparency for customers, investors, and the wider public by explaining what the organization is doing and why. It also strengthens accountability by tracking goals, performance, and compliance with ethical practices. As a result, it helps build trust and credibility around the organization’s social and environmental responsibilities.
30 Sustainable Procurement Report
1. 94% of U.S. companies say CSRD reporting applies or will apply
In a PwC survey, 94% of U.S.-based companies said they are or will be required to report under the EU CSRD. That 94% highlights how European rules can shape U.S. sourcing and supplier data requirements.
It also implies growing pressure for consistent sustainability data across global operations. For procurement, it raises expectations around supplier disclosures and traceability.
2. 87% of the U.S.-based companies plan to report using ISSB standards
PwC found 87% of U.S. companies surveyed say they will produce reporting using ISSB standards. The 87% figure suggests convergence toward a common reporting baseline, even outside Europe.
It typically increases demand for consistent, auditable ESG metrics across operations and supply chains. It also makes comparability between companies more realistic over time.
3. 29% of U.S. firms reported increased internal pressure to provide sustainability data
PwC notes 29% of U.S. companies reported heightened internal pressure to supply sustainability data. That 29% indicates internal stakeholders (leadership, finance, risk) are actively asking for better ESG inputs.
More internal pressure usually means clearer ownership, tighter controls, and more frequent reporting cycles. It can also accelerate investments in data systems and governance.
4. 42% of U.S. firms saw external pressure moderately increase for sustainability reporting
In the same PwC findings, 42% of U.S. firms said external pressure had moderately increased. The 42% reflects rising demands from customers, partners, and investors for credible sustainability information.
More pressure often translates into more questionnaires, evidence requests, and verification expectations. It also pushes companies to clarify methodologies and scope boundaries in their disclosures.
5. 25% post-consumer recycled content required in Washington plastic beverage bottles in 2026
Washington’s SB 5022 sets a target of 25% PCR content for plastic beverage bottles in 2026. That 25% requirement forces brands to prove recycled-content percentages through suppliers.
It can increase demand for verified recycled resin and tighten competition for compliant material. The indicator is a clear example of how state policy directly reshapes packaging purchasing specs.
6. 40% PCR requirement ends in 2026, as reusable plastic grocery bags are prohibited
A Retail Industry Leaders Association (RILA) packaging brief notes that reusable plastic grocery bags had a 40% postconsumer recycled content requirement. It also states that beginning January 1, 2026, those requirements are repealed because reusable plastic grocery bags will be prohibited.
The 40% figure matters because it shows the level of recycled content previously demanded by law. The policy shift can move demand away from that bag format and into alternative materials and suppliers.
7. 25% PCR requirement for Washington plastic beverage containers in 2026
Washington requires plastic beverage containers (excluding certain special categories) to contain at least 25% post-consumer recycled (PCR) content by weight during 2026–2030.
The law sets the percentage as an annual minimum on average across total volume sold. It then increases again in later years
8. 15% PCR requirement for Washington household cleaning & personal care containers in 2026
Washington requires household cleaning and personal care product containers to contain at least 15% PCR content by weight during 2025–2027.
The requirement is explicitly structured as a minimum annual average. It increases in later compliance windows.
9. 25% PCR requirement for Maine plastic beverage containers beginning in 2026
Maine’s policy sets a minimum of 25% PCR content for plastic beverage containers starting January 1, 2026.
This requirement is described as a clear step in a broader recycled-content schedule. It increases again in later years.
10. 90%+ CBAM importer exemption shifts the compliance burden
A broad exemption would remove 90%+ of low-volume importers from heavy admin work, while concentrating reporting on big import flows.
Expect fewer companies to do deeper emissions documentation and supplier verification. Procurement teams tied to high-volume imports will feel the biggest change.
11. 99%+ emissions coverage keeps CBAM pressure on carbon-intensive categories
Even with fewer importers reporting, the mechanism still targets 99%+ of covered emissions.
Expect the strictest data demands around high-emission materials and large suppliers. The practical effect is “less breadth, more depth” for those remaining in scope.
12. 1% / 3% / 9% EUDR checks create uneven enforcement by origin
Risk-tier enforcement means low-risk sourcing faces 1% checks, standard risk 3%, and high-risk 9%.
Expect stronger traceability packs, geolocation evidence, and refresh cycles where the 9% tier applies. This will influence which regions and suppliers feel easiest to buy from.
13. 4% turnover fines raise the cost of getting EUDR wrong
Penalties up to 4% of turnover (per EU country) make deforestation due diligence a financial risk, not just a reporting task.
Expect more contract protections (audit rights, warranties, indemnities) and more “proof-first” purchasing gates. High-risk commodities will see the tightest supplier onboarding requirements.
14. 12% with “actual emissions data” shows a CBAM readiness gap
Only 12% reporting “actual emissions data” signals many supply chains still rely on estimates.
Expect intensified supplier engagement to deliver verified product-specific emissions factors. Data quality will become a differentiator for cost and compliance performance.
15. 80% default-value dependence indicates costly assumptions will persist
Heavy reliance on default values (80%) suggests many firms can’t yet get primary data from suppliers.
Expect buyers to push harder for auditable emissions inputs to avoid unfavorable defaults. Verification, governance, and supplier templates will become more common.
16. 10% default-value penalty makes weak data directly more expensive
A 10% penalty/uplift on defaults increases the financial incentive to improve emissions data quality.
Expect stronger contract clauses requiring verified supplier data and more internal controls around calculations. Companies that stay on defaults will likely face higher compliance costs.
17. 2.5% CBAM phase-out factor starts the carbon-cost ratchet
A phase-out factor beginning at 2.5% signals rising carbon cost exposure over time.
Expect earlier pricing discussions, more focus on lower-carbon suppliers, and more attention to emissions reduction plans in sourcing. Some categories may see the carbon cost pass-through show up more visibly.
18. 1% SAF target in Singapore aviation procurement
Singapore has set a 1% sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) uplift target for 2026, and the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore links this target to a mandatory SAF levy for departing flights.
This directly affects aviation procurement because airlines and fuel suppliers must plan for SAF sourcing, pricing, and compliance within the levy framework. For procurement teams, it is a clear 2026 signal that low-carbon fuel purchasing is becoming a regulated sourcing requirement, not just a voluntary ESG initiative.
19. 33.01% renewable consumption obligation in India
India’s notified Renewable Consumption Obligation sets the total renewable electricity consumption requirement at 33.01% for FY 2025–26.
This percentage matters for sustainable procurement because it shapes how obligated entities source electricity and structure energy contracts in 2026. It also increases the importance of auditable energy sourcing data and supplier-side compliance in industrial and commercial procurement.
20. 15% green public procurement share in Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan’s policy sets a target for at least 15% of public procurement to qualify as green procurement in 2026.
This is a strong procurement indicator because it changes tender expectations and encourages suppliers to prove environmental performance in a more structured way. In practice, it increases demand for green specifications, documentation, and supplier readiness in public-sector purchasing.
21. 30% recycled plastic threshold in UK packaging procurement
In the UK, the Plastic Packaging Tax applies to plastic packaging components with less than 30% recycled plastic, so the 30% threshold remains a key procurement benchmark in 2026.
This creates a direct cost incentive for buyers to source packaging with verified recycled content and stronger traceability. For procurement teams, it makes supplier evidence and recycled-content documentation a practical purchasing priority, not just a sustainability preference.
22. 25% recycled PET requirement in EU countries’ beverage bottles
Across EU countries, PET beverage bottles are required to contain at least 25% recycled plastic, and this requirement continues to apply in 2026.
This is a highly relevant sustainable procurement indicator because it increases competition for compliant recycled PET (rPET) and raises the need for reliable supplier verification. It also pushes procurement teams to secure long-term supply and improve material traceability in packaging categories.
23. 2% SAF blending obligation at EU airports
Under ReFuelEU Aviation, fuel suppliers at covered EU airports are subject to a 2% SAF minimum supply mandate, and that requirement remains in force in 2026.
This affects sustainable procurement by making SAF sourcing, contract terms, and fuel compliance data part of normal aviation procurement operations. For airlines and fuel suppliers, the 2% mandate is a concrete regulatory baseline that drives purchasing decisions across EU aviation markets.
24. The UK in 2026 raises the bar as 3.60% SAF becomes the mandatory minimum in aviation fuel
The UK SAF mandate starts at 2% in 2025 and increases linearly to 10% by 2030, which equals +1.6 percentage points per year.
Based on that, the 2026 minimum is 3.6% of total jet fuel supplied in the UK (2.0% + 1.6%). For procurement, this means SAF becomes a mandatory requirement to be built into fuel supply contracts and sourcing plans for the UK market.
25. Switzerland in 2026 introduces a 2% SAF minimum at key airports, Zurich and Geneva
From 1 January 2026, Switzerland applies the ReFuelEU Aviation regime at Zurich and Geneva airports.
This introduces a minimum 2% SAF blend in aviation fuel supplied by providers at those airports. Procurement, therefore, needs to embed the SAF percentage, evidence requirements, and compliance controls into contract terms and supplier management.
26. South Korea in 2026 requires 10% rPET in bottles as packaging enters a new era of content verification
South Korea is introducing mandatory use of recycled plastic in PET bottles for water and soft drinks from 2026.
The threshold is set at a minimum of 10% recycled PET in bottles, based on the policy description and implementation framework. This directly affects packaging procurement through material specifications, supplier certificates, and auditable proof of rPET content.
27. Japan in 2026 sets a 15% recycled PET threshold for compliant bottles and more stable sourcing
Japan is introducing criteria under which PET bottles become “eligible” for eco or design certification if they meet a recycled-content threshold.
The relevant threshold is at least 15% recycled content (or recycled and/or bio-based in combination, depending on the exact criterion) from 2026. In practice, this creates a minimum requirement for selecting and qualifying packaging suppliers, along with documentation and design-condition requirements.
28. Thailand in 2026 launches a 1% SAF obligation as the regulation enters aviation procurement
Thailand introduces an initial mandate that Jet A-1 must contain 1% SAF from 1 January 2026.
This is a direct procurement issue for aviation fuel because the blend percentage becomes a mandatory purchasing specification. In practice, additional requirements are expected to show up through fuel standards, contract clauses, and supplier compliance monitoring.
29. Indonesia in 2026 locks in B40 as a 40% biodiesel blend, and fuel becomes a procurement specification
Indonesia maintains the mandatory B40 regime in 2026, meaning a 40% biodiesel blend in diesel as a mandate.
Reuters reports that B40 is planned to remain in place, alongside discussions about a possible shift to B50 later in 2026, but B40 stays as the baseline. For procurement, this means fuel contracts need a clear blend requirement, and it can materially affect both pricing and feedstock availability.
30. South Africa in 2026 pushes local content as a 44% procurement requirement that strengthens domestic supplier networks
For the Redstone CSP project, it is stated that the build phase will reach close to 44% local content in procurement.
This percentage directly shapes procurement strategy because it requires local suppliers, local subcontractors, and tenders aligned to local-content targets. In practice, it changes supplier qualification, contract structures, and category planning to identify where local content can be achieved.
Conclusion
These indicators collectively show that sustainable procurement is increasingly driven by clearer sustainability goals, stronger reporting expectations, and higher demands for transparent supplier data. They reflect a shift from broad commitments toward measurable actions, where supplier engagement, traceability, and risk management become central. Overall, the trend points to more structured decision-making that connects procurement choices with environmental, social, and governance performance.
Furthermore, I have created a free-to-download, editable Sustainable Procurement Strategy template. It’s a PowerPoint file that can help you with your sustainability initiatives. I even created a video where I’ll explain how you can use this template.
Frequentlyasked questions
What is a sustainable procurement report?
A sustainable procurement report is a document that shows an organization’s efforts, progress, and impact in integrating sustainable practices into its procurement processes.
Why is sustainable procurement report important?
The sustainable procurement report is a key instrument that not only helps organizations manage risks and showcase CRS initiatives but also fosters a culture of continuous improvement, aligning the organization with evolving global expectations for responsible and sustainable business practices.
What is the key thing that affects the sustainability of procurement in 2026?
The key thing that affects the sustainability of procurement in 2026 is reliable, verifiable suppliers and impact data that enables compliance with rising reporting and policy requirements.
About the author
My name is Marijn Overvest, I’m the founder of Procurement Tactics. I have a deep passion for procurement, and I’ve upskilled over 200 procurement teams from all over the world. When I’m not working, I love running and cycling.
